Reach Us +44-1477412632
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

CONDITION, LENGTH-WEIGHT AND LENGTH-LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS FOR FIVE FISH SPECIES FROM HIRFANLI RESERVOIR, TURKEY

Serife Gülsün Kirankaya1*, F. Güler Ekmekçi2, Sükran Yalçin-Özdilek3, Baran Yogurtçuoglu2, Lale Gençoglu1,2

1Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Düzce University, Düzce/ Turkey

2Hydrobiology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

3Ecology Division, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Terzioglu Campus, Canakkale, Turkey

*Corresponding Author:s
Serife Gülsün KIRANKAYA
Department of Biology
Faculty of Arts and Science
Düzce University, Düzce-TURKEY
Tel: (+90 380) 541 24 04
Fax: (+90 380) 541 24 03
E-mail: [email protected]

Received date: 09.09.2013; Accepted date: 06.03.2014; Published date: 29.06.2014

 
Visit for more related articles at Journal of FisheriesSciences.com

Abstract

The condition (K), length-weight and length-length relationships, total length (TL), fork length (FL), and standard length (SL) were described herein for the following 5 fish species inhabiting Hirfanlı Reservoir (Central Anatolia): Pseudorasbora parva, Atherina boyeri, Aphanius danfordii, Tinca tinca, and Cyprinus carpio. Fish specimens were obtained between March and November 2008 using trawl nets. The length-weight relationship exponent b value ranged from 2.896 in C. carpio to 3.67 in A. danfordii. The b value for all species deviated from 3 and posi-tive allometric growth was observed for A. danfordii, A. boyeri, P. parva, and T. tinca. Fulton’s condition factor varied between 0.604 (A. boyeri) and 1.721 (A. danfordii). The length-length relationships were significantly linear.

Keywords

Exotic fish, Endemic fish, Length-weight relations, Condition, Hirfanli Reservoir

Introduction

The length-weight relationship (LWR) is an important tool in fishery management. Primarily, the relationship between fish length and weight can be used to convert length to weight and vice versa. Fish length is often more rapidly and accurately measured than fish weight (Le Cren1951). In particular, length can be measured more easily than weight during field studies; therefore, weight can be estimated after field studies using the length-weight relationship. Furthermore, length-weight regressions have been used extensively for conversion of growth in length equations to growth in weight equations in the stock assessment models; for estimation of standing-crop biomass when the length frequency distribution is known, and for predicting the condition index (Le Cren 1951; Wootton 1990; Petrakis and Stergiou 1995; King, 1996). Additionally, the LWR is useful for comparing the life history of a species in different regions and/or seasons (Wootton, 1990; Gonçalves et al. 1997) and it can be used for morphological comparison of species and populations (Petrakis and Stergiou 1995; King, 1996).

The length-length relationships (LLR) are also important in fishery management. In ich-thyological researchs different types of fish length measurements are utilized. For instance, standard length (SL) is used in systematic stud-ies, whereas total length (TL) and fork (FL) length are commonly used for estimation of fish growth. Length measurements of fishes should be standardized to facilitate comparison of different populations; therefore, LLR in different populations should be known. LLR is also im-portant for comparative growth studies (Mou-topoulos and Stergiou 2002).

The condition factor is a quantitative param-eter of the state of well-being of a fish. Indices of condition are indirect, but sometimes useful indicators of changes in the growth rate (Wootton 1990). The condition of a fish is indicative of recent physical and biological circumstances (Le Cren 1951); thus, the condition factor provides important information about present and future population success via its association with growth, reproduction, and survival.

The aim of the present study was to describe the condition, LWR and LLR for 5 fish species in Hirfanli Reservoir, Turkey. Of the 5 species presented herein, the endemic species Aphanius danfordii has a natural population, whereas Pseudorasbora parva, Atherina boyeri, Cyprinus carpio, and Tinca tinca were introduced into the reservoir. LWR of the fish species presently dwelling in Hirfanli Reservoir was examined in order to understand the effect of the changes in the ichthyofauna due to fish introductions in the reservoir; however, long-term observation is required to observe the effects of changes in the ichthyofauna on fish populations. We hypothesized that findings of the present study would provide a basis for further evaluation of the changes in fish growth following subsequent illegal introduction of alien species into the reservoir.

Materials and Methods

The specimens included in this study were collected from Hirfanli Reservoir, which is lo-cated on the Kizilirmak River Basin in Central Anatolia (33°31′07.16″ E, 39°16′22.2″N). The dam that created the reservoir was completed in 1953. Although the native fish fauna of the res-ervoir consisted of Cyprinus carpio, Squalius cephalus, Capoeta capoeta, Silurus glanis, Barbus tauricus, Alburnus sp., and Chon-drostoma nasus at the end of the 1960s, it has changed significantly since then due to anthro-pogenic effects. Carp, sander, tench, and crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) were introduced into the reservoir after the 1970s for fishery management (Anonymous 2005). Today, such non-native species as Pseudorasbora parva and i, and such native endemic species as Aphanius danfordii have dense populations in the reservoir and share the same habitat (Ekmekçi et al. 2010).

Samples were caught monthly from March to November 2008 by trawl net with 5-mm mesh from the lakeshore at a maximum depth of 5 m. Fish specimens were anesthetized using MS 222, preserved in 4% formaldehyde solution and then transported to the laboratory for further analysis. TL, FL, and SL were measured to the nearest 0.05 mm, and weight (W) was measured to the nearest 0.001 g. Sex was determined via macroscopic or microscopic observation. The following relationships were established using linear regression analysis; W-TL, FL-TL, SL-TL, and SL-FL. Log-transformed data were used to establish the LWR. The parameters a and b were calculated using least-squares regression. Both comparison of the slopes of the length-weight regression between sexes and variation in coefficient b from 3 were tested using Student’s t-test (Zar 1999). Fulton’s condition factor (K) was calculated using the equation K = (W/L3) × 100, where W is total body weight (g) and L is total length (cm) (Le Cren 1951).

Results and Discussion

In total, 4598 specimens of 5 fish species be-longing to the families Cyprinidae, Cyprino-dontidae, and Atherinidae were collected from Hirfanli Reservoir. The sample size and the re-lationships between TL, FL, and SL in selected fishes are shown in Table 1. All the examined relationships were significantly linear with all coefficients of determination values (r2 > 0.98, P < 0.01).

fisheriessciences-Standard-length

Table 1: Relationships between total, fork and standard length for five fish species in Hirfanli Reservoir. TL: Total length in mm, FL: Fork length in mm, SL: Standard length in mm, n: sample size, a and b are the parameters of linear regression analysis

Length range, LWR parameters a and b, standard errors of parameters a and b, and the coefficient of determination (r2) for selected fishes are given in Table 2. All relationships were statistically significant (P < 0.01) and r2values were found close to 1. The LWR expo-nent b varied between 2 and 4, but was often a value close to 3 and a value of 3 indicates iso-metric growth and values other than 3 indicate allometric growth (Tesch, 1971). In the present study, the estimates of the parameter b varied between 2.896 for C. carpio and 3.67 for A. danfordii (Table 2). According to the results, A. danfordii, A. boyeri, P. parva, and T. tinca ex-hibited positive allometric growth (b > 3, P<0.05), versus negative allometric in C. carpio (b < 3, P<0.05).

fisheriessciences-Estimated-parameters

Table 2: Estimated parameters of the total length-weight relationship and Fulton’s condition factor for five fish species shared same habitat in Hirfanli Reservoir

The LWR can be indicative of spatial and temporal variations related to water temperature, food availability, and reproductive activity (Wootton 1990). LWR parameters a and b are affected by a number of factors, including sex, gonad maturity, health status, season, habitat, nutrition, environmental conditions such as temperature and salinity, stomach fullness, gen-eral fish condition, differences in length range of fish specimens, and collection gear (Froese 2006; Tesch 1971). In Hirfanli Reservoir a slight temporal change was observed in the b value in T. tinca and C. carpio (Table 3); however, there was not a difference in the allometric growth pattern between the 2 populations

fisheriessciences-Reservoir-during

Table 3: b values in LWR and K of C. carpio and T. tinca from Hirfanli Reservoir during different periods

Table 2 also shows Fulton’s condition factor (K) for selected species. K ranged from 0.604 for A. boyeri to 1.721 for A. danfordii. Population dynamics studies have shown that high condition factor values indicate favorable environmental conditions (such as habitat and prey availability) and that low values indicate less than favorable environmental conditions (Blackwell et al. 2000). The condition factor fluctuates due to interaction between feeding conditions, parasitic infections, and physiological factors (Le Cren 1951). The condition factor for C. carpio and T. tinca have a tendency of temporal decrease (Table 3). Differences in the condition factor have been considered indicative of various biological features, such as fatness or suitability of the environment (Le Cren, 1951). The temporal decrease in K in both of the species in the present study could be considered indicative of degradation in feeding conditions. On the other hand, a decrease in exponent b and K values in T. tinca are indicative of possible competition between C. carpio and other non-native species recently introduced into the reservoir.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results provide basic in-formation on the LWR, LLR, and condition of 5 introduced and native fish populations in Hirfanli Reservoir. The temporal changes ob-served in b and K values in the C. carpio and T. tinca populations, which existed in the reservoir prior to the introduction of P. parva and A. boyeri, could be considered an indicator of niche competition between the species. We think long-term monitoring is essential to more clearly determine the effects of recently introduced species on the other species that share the same reservoir habitat, and that such findings would be useful for sustainable fishery management in Hirfanli Reservoir.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBITAK) project no: 107.O.718.

References

Anonymous, (2005). Devlet Su Isleri (DSI), Hirfanli ve Kesikköprü Baraj Gölleri ve Havzalarinda Kirlilik Arastirmasi, Ankara.

Blackwell, B.G., Brown, M.L., Willis, D.W., (2000). Relative weight (Wr) status and current use in fisheries assesment and management, Revievs in Fisheries Science, 8: 1-44. doi: 10.1080/10641260091129161

Ekmekçi, F.G., Yalçin-Özdilek, S., Kirankaya, S.G., (2010). Determination of Reproduction, Growth and Feeding Habits of Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) as an Inadvertently Introduced Invasive Species into Hirfanli Dam Lake, TÜBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) Project no: TOVAG 107-O-718 Ankara.

Froese R., (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: meta-analysis and recommendations, Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 241-253. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x

Gonçalves, J.M.S., Bentes, L., Lino P.G., Ribeiro J., Canário A.V.M., Erzini, K., (1997). Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of small-scale demersal fisheries of the south and southwest coasts of Portugal, Fisheries Research, 30: 253-256. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(96)00569-3

Karabatak M., (1977). HirFanli Baraji'ndaki Sudak (Stizostedion lucioperca L.) ve Sazan (Cyprinus carpio L.) Populasyonlarinda En Küçük Av Büyüklügü, (Doktora Tezi), Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi, Ankara.

King, R.P., (1996). Length-weight relationships of Nigerian Freshwater Fishes, Naga ICLARM Q, 19(3): 49-52.

Le Cren E.D. (1951). The Length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis), Journal of Animal Ecology, 20: 201-219. doi: 10.2307/1540

Moutopoulos K., Stergiou K.I., (2002). Length-weight and length-length relationships of fish species from Aegean Sea (Greece), Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 18: 200-203. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00281.x

Petrakis, G., Stergiou, K.I., (1995). Weight-length relationships for 33 fish species in Greek waters, Fisheries Research, 21: 465-469. doi: 10.1016/0165-7836(94)00294-7

Tesch, F.W., (1971). Age and growth. In: Ricker, W.E. (Ed.), Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 99–130.

Wootton, R.J., (1990). Ecology of teleost fishes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.

Yilmaz S., Yazicioglu O., Yilmaz M., Polat N., (2010). Hirfanli Baraj Gölü'nde Yasayan Cyprinus carpio L., 1758 ve Tinca tinca (L., 1758)' nin Boy-Agirlik ve Boy-Boy iliskileri ile Mevsimsel Kondisyon Faktörleri, SDU Journal of Science, 5(2): 154-162.

Yilmaz M., Gül A., Saylar Ö., (2007). Hirfanli Baraj Gölü (Kirsehir)'nde Yasayan Cyprinus carpio L., 1758'nun Büyüme Özellikleri, Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1): 37-57.

Zar J.H., (1999). Biostatistical Analysis (4th ed). Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Post your comment

Share This Article

Flyer image
journal indexing image
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh