Reach Us +44-1477412632

SUMMER MESOZOOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES IN THE TURKISH COASTAL WATERS OF NORTH AEGEAN SEA

Melek Isinibilir*

Istanbul University, Fisheries Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey

*Corresponding Author:
Melek Isinibilir
stanbul University, Fisheries Faculty
34470, Istanbul-TURKEY
Tel: (+90 212) 455 57 00/16417
Fax: (+90 212) 514 03 79
E-mail: [email protected]
 
Visit for more related articles at Journal of FisheriesSciences.com

Abstract

This study was carried out in the northern Aegean Sea during August 2001. Distribution pattern was studied and community analyses of mesozooplankton were made at seven stations in the Turkish coastal waters of northern Aegean Sea. At all stations holoplankton dominated the assemblages (86-99%). Copepods were by far the most abundant taxon contributing 37-92%. The copepod species Acartia clausi, Paracalanus parvus, Mecynocera clausi, Oithona nana and three cladoceran species Penilia avirostris, Evadne tergestina and Evadne spinifera were important components of the zooplankton community in this study.

Keywords

Mesozooplankton, Abundance, Aegean Sea

Introduction

The Eastern Mediterranean Sea has been characterized as an oligotrophic environment (Azov, 1991). This oligotrophic character has also been documented for open sea areas of the Aegean Sea but coastal waters show higher values in nutrient concentration, phytoplankton and zooplankton abundance (Stergiou et al., 1997). Mesozooplankters play a critical role in the pelagic carbon-flow process through their interaction with higher and lower tropic levels within the water column or within the benthic community (Isari et al., 2007). The Northern Aegean Sea constitutes an important area within the Mediterranean Sea due to its geographical position between the Black Sea and the main eastern Mediterranean basin. Previous studies in the Aegean Sea revealed a gradual differentiation of the zooplankton community from the northeastern region to the southeastern Aegean, mainly due to the oceanographic heterogeneity (Moraitou-Apostolopoulou, 1972; Siokou- Frangou et al., 1990, 2002). Several studies have been carried out over the last two decades in the Mediterranean Sea (Moraitou-Apostolopoulou, 1972; Siokou-Frangou, 1996; Siokou-Frangou et al., 1990, 1998, 2002) but there is no information on the distribution of mesozooplankton in the coastal waters of Turkey in North Aegean Sea.

The aim of this study is briefly describe mesozooplankton communities in the Turkish coastal areas of North Aegean Sea.

Material and Methods

Zooplankton samples were collected at 7 stations during 3-8 August 2001 with standard WP2 plankton net (a 200 μm mesh size and 57 cm diameter) (Figure 1). Samples were taken to surface from bottom, and from 100m (depth was more than 100m). The net was rinsed gently and samples were transferred into plastic containers, and fixed by addition of borax buffered formaldehyde to a final concentration of 4%. Identification of specimens was carried out under stereomicroscope using a Bogorov-Rass counting chamber. Quantitative analyses of common species were conducted from subsamples taken by a 1 ml Stempel pipette (at least twice). Rare species were identified from the entire sample. Cladocerans and copepods were identified to species or genus level. All other taxa were identified to the lowest possible taxa. Water temperature and salinity were measured by pIONeer 65 multiprobes, according to the practical salinity unit.

fisheriessciences-Study-area

Figure 1: Study area and sampling stations

Results and Discussion

The sea surface salinity and temperature ranged from 30.8 to 38.7 psu and 22.1 to 28.0 °C, respectively (Figure 2). The outflow of low salinity Black sea water from the Dardanelles Strait into the northeastern part of the Aegean Sea forms a stable salinity front throughout the year and its position varies seasonally (Zervakis and Georgopoulos 2002). During warm periods, under the influence of the annual northern winds, a large proportion of the Black Sea water flows southwestwards. Our study showed that the upper water column was greatly influenced by the low salinity Black Sea water.

fisheriessciences-Surface-temperature

Figure 2: Surface temperature (°C) and salinity (psu) of sampling stations.

At all stations the numerical dominance of holoplankton is overwhelming (Figure 3), accounting for 86-99% of the total abundance of individuals. Within the holoplankton copepods (Figure 5) were by far the most abundant taxon (max 1370.7 ind.m-3) contributing 37-92%. Cladocerans ranked secondly (3-44%), followed by appendicularians (1-6%) and chaetognaths (1- 3%). Bivalvia larvae (max. 114.6 ind.m-3) dominated the meroplankton (33-100%), followed by larvae of cirripeds (18-67%), polychaetes (7- 13%), and echinoderm (7-11%) (Figure 4, 6). As a result Copepods dominate in the entire study area. Similar studies in Aegean Sea reveal similar results with regard to the dominance of copepods (Siokou-Frangou, 1996; Ramfos et al., 2005; Zervoudaki et al., 2006). The presence of cladocerans and appendicularians in the study area could be an important aspect for the carbon flux as these groups potentially have a very high population growth rate and therefore contribute to high carbon turnover (Hopcroft and Roff, 1995; Rose et al., 2004).

fisheriessciences-Abundance-holoplankton

Figure 3: Abundance (ind.m-3) of holoplankton.

fisheriessciences-Abundance-meroplankton

Figure 4: Abundance (ind.m-3) of meroplankton.

fisheriessciences-zooplankton-groups

Figure 5: Abundance (ind.m-3) of important zooplankton groups in holoplankton.

fisheriessciences-zooplankton-groups

Figure 6: Abundance (ind.m-3) of important zooplankton groups in meroplankton.

The copepod species Acartia clausi, Paracalanus parvus, Mecynocera clausi, Oithona nana and Oithona similis were important components of the zooplankton community in this study (Table 1). Three cladoceran species Penilia avirostris, Evadne tergestina and Evadne spinifera were identified. P. avirostris showed a marked predominance, E. tergestina and E. spinifera followed in rank order. The species A. clausi, P. parvus and P. avirostris are some of the most common species in the Black Sea (Kovalev et al., 2001) and they could be transported into the northern Aegean Sea through the Black Sea outflow. Similar results have also been reported in other studies (Tarkan, 2000; Zervoudaki et al., 2006).

fisheriessciences-important-species

Table 1: Abundance (ind.m-3) of most important species found in the stations.

In conclusion the zooplankton distribution and community structure in the north Aegean Sea are strongly influenced by hydrological features. These are especially salinity, temperature as well as continental shelf. It is clear that for a better understanding of the North Aegean Sea ecosystem, long-term monitoring data on the important biological components and on the quality and quantity of zooplankton is essential.

References

Azov, Y., (1991). Eastern Mediterranean-a marine desert?, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 23: 225- 232.

Hopcroft, R., Roff, J.C., (1995). Zooplankton growth rates: extraordinary production by the larvecean Oikopleura dioica in tropical waters, Journal of Plankton Research, 17: 205- 220.

Isari, S., Psarra, S., Pitta, P., Mara, P., Tomprou, M.O., Ramfos, A., Somarakis, S., Tselepides, A., Koutsikopoulos, C., Fragopoulu, N., (2007). Differential patterns of mesozooplankters’ distribution in relation to physical and biological variables of the northeastern Aegean Sea (eastern Mediterranean), Marine Biology, 151: 1035-1050.

Kovalev, A.V., Mazzocchi, M.G., Siokou-Frangou, I., Kideys, A.E., (2001). Zooplankton of the Black Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean: Similarities and dissimilarities, Mediterranean Marine Science, 2: 69-77.

Moraitou-Apostolopoulou, M., (1972). Occurrence and fluctuation of the pelagic copepods of the Aegean Sea with some notes on their ecology, Hellenic Oceanography and Limnology, 11: 325-402.

Ramfos, A., Somarakis, S., Koutsikopoulos C., Fragopoulu, N., (2005). Summer mesozooplankton distribution in coastal waters of central Greece (eastern Mediterranean), I. Hydrology and group composition, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 85: 755-764.

Rose, K., Roff, J.C., Hopcroft, R., (2004). Production of Penilia avirostris in Kingston harbour, Jameica, Journal of Plankton Research, 26: 605-615.

Siokou-Frangou, I., (1996). Zooplankton annual cycle in a Mediterranean coastal area, Journal of Plankton Research, 18: 203-223.

Siokou-Frangou, I., Pancucci-Papadopoulou, A., Kouyoufas, P., (1990). Etude de la repartition du zooplancton dans les mers Egee et Ionienne. Rapp. P-V Reun. CIESM 32(1): 221.

Siokou-Frangou, I., Papathanassiou, E., Lepretre, A., Frontier, S., (1998). Zooplankton assemblages and influence of environmental parameters on them in a Mediterranean coastal area, Journal of Plankton Research, 20: 847- 870.

Siokou-Frangou, I. Bianchi, M., Christaki U., Christou, E.D., Giannakourou, A., Gotsis, O., Ignatiades, L., Pagou, K., Pitta, P., Psarra, S., Souvermezoglou, A., Van Wambe, F., Zervakis, V., (2002). Organic carbon partitioning and carbon flow along a gradient of oligotrophy in the Aegean Sea (Mediterranean Sea), Journal of Marine System, 33/34: 325-53.

Stergiou, K.I., Christou, E.D., Georgopoulos, D., Zenetos, A., Souvermezoglou, E., (1997). The Hellenic Seas: physics, chemistry, biology and fisheries, Oceanography and Marine Biology, 35: 413-538.

Tarkan, A.N., (2000). Abundance and distribution of zooplankton in coastal area of Gökçeada island (Northern Aegean Sea), Turkish Journal Marine Sciences, 6: 201-214.

Zervakis, V., Georgopoulos, D., (2002). Hydrology and circulation in the North Aegean (Eastern Mediterranean) throughout 1997 and 1998, Mediterranean Marine Science, 3: 5- 20.

Zervoudaki, S., Nielsen, T.G., Christou, E.D., Siokou-Frangou, I., (2006). Zooplankton distribution and diversity in frontal area of the Aegean Sea, Marine Biology Research, 2: 149-168.

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Post your comment

Share This Article

Flyer image
journal indexing image
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh